Experiment: Upgrading my Dell Studio XPS PSU and GPU

Dell-PC-level-up

Like I mentioned in this post, I got a new Dell Studio XPS 8100 PC recently and had upgraded the stock GPU – a shitty ATI 5450 – with my old 9800GT. While this was definitely a huge improvement over the ATI card, I felt like a new card was necessary in order to use the PC to it’s full power. I did some googling and determined the Nvidia GTX 460 SSC was the way to go. However, a new card would also mean a new power supply, as the one Dell provides is only a measly 350 watts, not something that would hold up well with a new juice-hungry GPU. At first, I was a little worried that everything wouldn’t fit in the Dell case, even after all the research I did. The Studio XPS 8100 has a very small and restricting case, and I wanted to make sure that everything would work and I wouldn’t be sending stuff back the next day. Well, five days later the parts showed up at my doorstep, and Trace and I got to work. Well… mostly just Trace.

Luckily, it all worked out! The power supply fit perfectly, as the Dell case will accept any standard ATX PSU. As for the GTX 460, it was also a breeze to install and actually ended up being smaller than my 9800GT length-wise. Because I didn’t opt for a modular power supply, the inside of the PC now looks like techno tentacle city, but it’s not a huge problem. Definitely go for a modular cable system if you’re looking to upgrade yours, or buy a whole lot of zip ties.

After my friend got everything into place, we plugged everything in and hoped for the best… after all, exploding power supplies aren’t exactly rare. I made sure to go with an Antec brand PSU and not a cheaper brand, and I definitely don’t regret that.

I was relieved when the PC booted up as normal and everything seemed to be working. Another successful procedure! Trace did recommend I add some more internal cooling measures, since there is only one fan inside the case, but that was out of the question, as my wallet had already dried up and died.

Since then, I’ve done some testing and determined that the GTX 460 is one hell of a card. It’s been running all my games at smooth frame rates that are nearly double what I got out of my 9800GT, which is awesome. Even more cool is the mini-HDMI port on the card that allows me to hook up the PC to my 26” HDTV. I’ve tried VGA on the TV and it looks terrible, but I was very surprised with the quality via HDMI. Just to test things out, I played some Modern Warfare 2, which looks amazing at the TV’s native resolution – even better than the output of my Xbox and PS3. The text is clear, graphics crisp and strong – it was a big surprise to me. Other games didn’t look as good, unfortunately (I also tried Rift and BioShock), but just being able to play on a 26” screen at good quality made me happy. I seriously recommend trying this if your card supports HDMI.

So, worth the $300 bucks? I think so. I’m very happy with the performance and things are holding up well.

-rav4ge 

Weekly Update 07/04/2011: Ghouls n Zombies

Hi there! It’s been a whole week without anything on this site. Let’s change that.

This is a Weekly Update, where I chronicle the games I’ve been playing (in order of most awesome), throw in some news, and include a little video or something at the end to finish things up. Okay? Okay.

NOW PLAYING:

Fallout: New Vegas (PC) – Six words: Why did I stop playing this. I remember getting bored with it a month after release forMake fun of his lazy eye, and eventually he'll attempt to kill you. No, seriously. reasons unknown, and later I even ended up going back to Fallout 3. Truth be told, Fallout 3 has a much more compelling main story line, but New Vegas destroys it in every other category – although, all the bugs/glitches really hold it back at times. Literally the only game I’ve ever played where I quick save like mad because of all the constant and unpredictable crashes.

With so many quests to complete, weapons to collect, and places to explore, New Vegas continues to be awesome. I may need to kick myself in the face for giving up on it so easily. I just hit level 20, and still loving it. VATS is the most satisfying game mechanic I have ever had the joy of playing with, but at the same time I’ve played two-hour sessions without killing anything. Great – but crashy – game.

He's popped one too many pills, it seems!Left 4 Dead 2 (PC) – Some friends and I got back into playing this. Just like New Vegas, after release we stopped playing it altogether. We did play it here and there at LAN Parties, but even that was a rarity.

Like my previous relationship with Fallout: New Vegas, this is also a shame, because Left 4 Dead 2 is awesome. Valve has done a great job adding new (and free!) content for us PC players, including bringing back the No Mercy campaign from the first title, which is great.

Running around, killing zombies by the truckloads, poppin’ pills – what’s not to freaking adore?

COMPUTER UPGRADES!

I blew all of my cash on some computer upgrades Wednesday. My computer is brand new, but my 9800GT is starting to show its age, so away it goes. I’m waiting anxiously for this guy to show up in the mail, along with a new power supply to keep things powered. I’m hoping everything will work out, because my case is pretty small and may not be able to fit these monsters. I’ll keep you posted.

I guess you could say this scared me enough to purchase these upgrades. These requirements are from Battle: Los Angeles, which is in fact, a movie game. They’re a little high for a budget title, but I’ve had that 9800GT for almost three years now, so what the hell.

scarystuff

VIDEO OF THE WEEK:

I’m going to wrap things here with an instant classic, and something I’ve been laughing at all week when I think about it. I’ve never played Heavy Rain, but I love the balls out of this video. It’s great.

-rav4ge

SOCOM 4 Beta Impressions


The SOCOM 4 Beta is here! I’ve played it for at least several hours, and I’m pretty sure the beta is no longer private – so here are my initial impressions.

As some of you might know, Gears of War 3 is my most anticipated game this year. Of course, Gears has always been Xbox exclusive and will continue to be. PS3 – while definitely not lacking in exclusives – doesn’t really have an equivalent. The Uncharted series comes to mind for a lot of people, but it doesn’t carry that heavy emphasis on multiplayer that Gears has always had. For me, Gears 2 was one of the most entertaining multiplayer games I had ever played, because it was so unique. While most shooters encourage run-and-gun tactics, here was a game that stood up for itself and remained tactical, which is encouraged when you can’t respawn after dying in a round. Respawns in other games seem like they keep people from being too careful, since it creates a “I’ll be back” mindset where death is hardly an issue. However, things like Gears’ powerful shotgun and the chainsaw bayonet also encouraged aggressive tactics. The game ended up being a mixed bag of cautious and also aggressive gameplay. This is why it was so great. If you downed some one, you felt accomplished. You wouldn’t have to worry about running into them for the rest of the round. I’m actually hoping Epic doesn’t include too many respawn-based gametypes in Gears 3 because I want more of the same with better servers and smoother gameplay.

But enough about Gears. Here’s SOCOM 4. It’s got the same style of play behind it – quick deaths mean you’ll have to rely on cover as well as your teammates to be successful. That’s the way I like to think of it, at least. A strategic military shooter.

Playing the beta though, I’m not feeling the strategy play out. Right now, because of the large amount of players on the map, and some physical similarities, SOCOM 4 feels more like 3rd-person MAG than anything, which isn’t good. The controls, visuals, icons – even the voice actors – feel so much like MAG that it’s almost awkward.

For the current beta, I was only able to play Supression and Capture, which are big team gametypes. I’m hoping later on that the 4 v 4 gametypes will be available to play, because it really does feel like 3rd-Person MAG. Not completely, but the similarities heavily outweigh the differences.

The game is fun, though. The guns are fun to shoot, and the maps are excellent – big, good looking, and like giant playgrounds. It seems like players die a little too quickly, however, especially at long range for some reason. I was able to take people out with cross-map head shots way too easily because there is almost no bullet drop. I’m hoping Zipper fine tunes this stuff, because it takes so many shots up close and so little at long range, which shouldn’t be the case. The cover system works well, although it’s a little wonky at times.

I have hope for this game. Zipper should definitely work on trying to distance it from MAG, however. When I think SOCOM, I think tactical, focused action, and that’s not what SOCOM 4 feels like.

-rav4ge

Nintendo 3DS: Do not want

…Yet.


I was pretty intent on buying a 3DS at launch, but the last month or so of not-so-juicy details really turned me off. I want to point out that the launch titles isn’t one of them. Super Street Fighter looks great, and then of course there’s other games like Ghost Recon and Nintendogs. Sure, it’s not the strongest launch lineup ever (actually, it’s not impressive whatsoever), but that’s fine with me, especially because we all know there’s only more good things to come.

Here’s what broke the deal for me, though.

The battery life of under 5 hours. This is pretty disappointing, and I’m pretty sure it’s also the worst battery life ever seen in a Nintendo handheld. Seriously, Nintendo? Not cool! At least have the non-3D usage amount to about the same as the older DS handhelds, that would make it worthwhile. Until the battery life is improved, I can’t slap down 250 smackers knowing the battery life is this bad.

The color difference when playing old DS titles on the 3DS. I haven’t used the 3DS yet of course, but these pictures and article that Nick Chester of Destructoid posted earlier worry me. If I did buy the 3DS, I’d buy only one new game to go along with it, probably Street Fighter. Other than that though, I’d be fine playing Pokémon White. Why does it look worse though? This is a new handheld! The playing experience of old titles should be the same, if not better due to the new screens (of course, the games themselves would be slightly stretched due to the bigger resolution). Why should this not be the case?

So, there you have it. I guess I should wait until the “3DS2″ comes out, but the Nintendo fan in me knows that waiting is for pansies, and that I’ll break down eventually and buy it. Such is the result of Nintendo lacing those A and B buttons with drugs, and stringing me along from my childhood until now, when I can no longer vouch for my parents to buy me games. Still, Game Boy 4 Life!

I am considering buying a DSi XL as they are pretty cheap now… but I think I’ll just see if I can wait it out.

-rav4ge

I can’t believe it’s not butter

I got a new PC over the weekend! Core i7, 8GB RAM, 1TB drive – good shit, and a huge step up from my 3–year-old middle-range gaming PC. The video card that came included though (the ATI Radeon 5450) really isn’t that great, and is actually a step down from my 9800 GT. So what ended up happening was I got bottle necked performance in all the games I tried, even in COD4. With everything turned up I got below 30 FPS for a 4–year-old game, which was a little disappointing. Yeah… not the greatest card.

So I swapped the ATI card out for my old 9800 GT, and the second I had everything in working order (around 11:00 PM) I fired up Bad Company 2 to see how things would run. After getting into a game –  literally in seconds – my mind was blown. I was so impressed with the performance that I had to tell everyone in the server how great it was in the chat. That’s how amazing it was. I can easily sum the performance up in one picture:

Butter

Let me put this into perspective –  I’ve been playing console games almost exclusively for a year now, including the 360 version of Bad Company 2. Most console games run at 30 FPS, maybe more. The Xbox version of Bad Company 2 probably runs at 30, and it looks nothing like the PC version if you have the settings turned up in the slightest. Playing it on the PC yesterday was amazing to me because of the immediate difference in performance. It really does remind me of butter. No hiccups, no drops, just constant smooth goodness.

Will I feel this way three years from now? …Nah. I’ll be back to consoles again. That’s okay though, I’ll be happy sitting in the “PC King” chair for a year. You know what they say… ignorance is bliss!

(also – Shogun 2 is installing right now, and I am excited!)

-rav4ge

Page 20 of 43« First...10«1819202122»3040...Last »